Leveraging the Real Power of Social Networking

In the past year many non-profits have latched onto online social networking as the hip new tool to magically promote their campaigns, recruit new supporters and raise loads of money online without costing a dime. Yes, Web 2.0 can be a powerful organizing tool for non-profits but there is no magic involved and it's not free.  It takes organizational commitment, creativity and significant staff resources to see a healthy return on investment over time. "You can't just set up a Twitter account, start sending "tweets" that say donate now and expect success.  You have to meet people where people are, engage, and build up social capital," says online social networking guru Beth Kanter.

Of course there are acceptations to the rules and once in a while a campaign takes off virally like our all time favorites the Sorry Everybody campaign that took the web by storm after Bush was reelected in 2004 or the video mashup of Apple's 1984 ad superimposed with Hillary Clinton's speech. These are campaigns that we like to call "you got lucky" which means some big bloggers and/or news reporters came across your campaign, liked it and plugged it as a cool campaign for their readers to check out.

Since there is a one in a million chance that your non-profit campaign will get lucky and spread virally without any work, it's best to stick to Rad Campaign's Rules of Engagement in building your online social networks. Then, when the opportunity arises you can ask your online social networks to sign an emergency petition or donate $50 to support a critical campaign.

Tara Hunt, Founder of Citizen Agency and who is writing a book on the power of online communities describes online social networking like bank accounts. "Using Twitter and Facebook to merely disseminate information is akin to just constantly withdrawing, but never depositing into your bank account. The power of these networks is in the connections people are making, which is the building of social capital. You build social capital through positive interactions - listening as much as you are talking, and responding to people as they talk to you. The more two way conversations you have on Twitter and Facebook, the more support you will gain for those messages you send out."

Holly Ross, Executive Director of NTEN agrees. "People use social networks because they want to interact and engage, not just passively consume information." So you'll need to approach your strategy with that in mind."

Ross sites NPR as a great example of how a group can effectively use Twitter online. "I keep NPR in my Twitter network because when there is a special event, like the recent Congressional hearings with General Petraeus, they live "tweet" the event, or add their commentary, and I can respond to them while they do it and ask my own questions.  That's the stuff these social networks are made of, " says Ross.
 
Jill Foster, Chairwoman for DC Web Women and Social Media Consultant says you need to build up your presence by actively contributing to online communities and offers the following tips. "Having an online social network means building community from the ground up starting with your contribution, for instance:  
  • creating useful blog content for nonprofits aka what it's like building an advisory board (then invite your Twitter, Facebook, and peer groups to read/comment);
  • commenting on other blogs, Facebook groups, etc that specialize in your field;
  • responding to new voices on Facebook, Twitter, or Utterz and their content."

While the age of Web 2.0 presents exciting opportunities to reach out to your target audiences "it takes time & initiative online to build them", says Foster. In a nutshell what you put in is what you get out.
 

<< Return to blog main

Write a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.

Please enter the code as it is shown below:

Heather C
Posts: 45
Comment
Thanks, Allyson!
Reply #1 on : Mon April 21, 2008, 09:26:19
Thanks, Allyson, for highlighting this topic and these incredible web women! I fully agree with Tara's analogy that social networking is akin to banking. However, the quotes here don't seem to get at what I think is the hardest part of leveraging a social network -- once you've built "it," what do you do to ensure that "they" will meaningfully participate? Beyond just asking folks to "sign this emergency petition," what are the unique ways in which individuals are making asks of other individuals?

At PledgeBank.com, we've found that making concrete asks of your network publicly adds a dimension to leveraging social networks that's missing from the "walled gardens" that most organizations still employ. Rather than asking your network to sign a petition, then never sharing who or how many people signed it, make the list public and ask folks to actively do something. Pledging to "support" an initiative writ-large is a much lower level of engagement than pledging to "contribute $10 and 10 hours of volunteer time" to an initiative...and then signing that pledge publicly for your friends to see. Then Tara's analogy of banking becomes more meaningful -- not only am I "depositing" into that account by actively participating in my network and "withdrawing" when I ask members of that network to participate in an initiative I care about, but I'm also assigning value to the currency I exchange by sharing with my friends the things I'm passionate about and connecting with them over shared visions of how to make the world a better place.

I'd encourage thinking beyond Twitter and Facebook to leverage a social network that will take concrete action, rather than just distributing information. The latter is important, but I suspect that the former is where real change will happen.
Rad or Bad?
Twitter. Totally rad. Follow Allyson on Twitter. Check out our write-up on Twitter here.
Rad News

Rad Campaign hosted Women Who Tech: A Telesummit for Women in Technology.  Podcasts are now available!

July: We will be presenting at the New Organzing Institute DC Training.